Last night I decided to try the Square of Sevens method of reading the cards. This is a method from a historical book whose author claims to have located a nearly-lost publication, which captured and revealed a barely-known Gypsy method of reading the past, present and future in playing cards. The book seems likely to be a literary hoax, which you can read about here. Someone went to a lot of work to create this piece of possible fiction, in my mind.
Hoax or not, I was curious about the method. It seems fairly legitimate, in terms of a reading method. It’s possible that the author had a method of card reading, and followed a common occult tradition of falsifying the source, in order to give lineage and a sense of importance to the material. (See: Golden Dawn.)
It’s a bit complicated, though not difficult. After setting aside three wish cards, the deck is laid out in a 7 x 7 pattern: starting with a stairstep pattern, then shuffling and dealing from bottom and top of the deck, in a prescribed fashion, until forty-nine cards are spread out. Then a “reduction” occurs, moving common suit cards to the left, and taking away cards so that a 3 x 7 column layout is left.
This 3 x 7 spread is interpreted row by row, according to a table of meanings given in the book. For each three card row, the rightmost card has a meaning based on the influence of the suit to its left; the middle card is interpreted based on the suit to its left; and the leftmost “master card” is interpreted on its own merit.
My first thought upon laying out the cards was that it takes a lot of space — I was using the floor, so I was okay, but a large tableย would be needed. The methodical shuffling and top or bottom dealing could help get one into a mindset, into the reading zone; so although it seems rather silly at first, I can’t complain about something that could settle a reader’s mind… although dealing from the bottom of the deck feels a little strange!
The reduction was interesting, as was the resulting 3 x 7 layout. The fact that a card is given meaning shaded by a neighbor’s suit reminds me a bit of the Master Method described by Foli, Sephariel and one book by John Dee. This method is generally attributed to Mlle. Lenormand, and uses a 36 card layout for a 36 card deck; each position is interpreted with a meaning based on the suit of the card that falls on it. I haven’t tried the Master Method yet, but it’s on my to-do list.
I’m sure some of my readers will wonder why I didn’t post a sample reading here. The fact is that I didn’t really care for the reading method. The card meanings were along the typical lines for the suits: hearts to emotion, diamonds to position and means, clubs to efforts and intellect, and spades to trouble. However, the fact that each card had a meaning modified by suit was a bit much for me in this first reading. I would have to study the table given to determine if there are consistent rules for how a card’s meaning is shaded by a neighbor; some of the cards made sense to me, and some did not. I would also prefer to then apply any rules to meanings that I already know, rather than rely on referencing a table, or having a new set of meanings to learn.
Overall, it was a fun experience. I enjoy learning new methods of working with cards, and I’ve been finding fertile grounds in some of the historical methods lately. This is one that I might play with in future, but not without some modifications for modern sensibilities or at least the application of card meanings I already know.
If anyone is curious, this public domain book is available for free from the above link to Project Gutenberg. If you give it a whirl, let me know in the comments.
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 7, 2010 at 7:35 pm
spiritsong
Funny enough, all this time later, I stumbled across the Square of Sevens on my external hard drive, and over a cup of tea, decided to systematically go through it and do a reading – I had totally forgotten that I had it!
I wasn’t thinking that it would give much info, to be honest, and doubted if the meanings would have any validity to me since they don’t equate much to how I read the playing cards, BUT I was quite surprised!
I found that I could relate to quite a few of the lines’ messages –
I cracked open a Patience deck (mini) that I had which was perfect for this spread.
It made for a fun Sunday morning card reading. I’ve printed off the meanings, and plan on experimenting over the months, and see how they do.
(I still have to sit down and work with the Oracle of Fortuna as well! never enough time)
I remembered for some reason, you mentioning the Square of Sevens once, so thought I would comment, and say HI ๐
hugs,
Spiritsong
March 8, 2010 at 10:29 am
Jason
Hi Spirity,
Thanks for posting about this. That sounds nice and cozy, reading with a cup of tea. ๐
It’s an interesting method, but yes, it does seem rather time consuming. I’ve found that to be the problem with Oracle of Fortuna as well. It’s fun to play, but time-consuming compared to just drawing some cards and reading. So I find myself using it less after my initial rush of enthusiasm, if I’m honest.
I later realized that Sepharial had described the Square of Sevens in one of his books. I keep meaning to check the date of publication, to compare to that of the Square of Sevens. The Square has been “proven” to be a literary hoax among public card aficionados, but if Sepharial wrote about it earlier than the formal publication, I wonder if that would affect the conjectured proof?
Thanks for stopping by!
March 8, 2010 at 11:18 am
spiritsong
I read Mary K. Greer’s blog article on it. Whether or not the story surrounding the method is concocted or not, the method itself still worked.
I’m going to play with it a bit – it’s not something I’d memorize to be able to read for others necessarily, but similar to the Gong Hee Fot Choy, it’s enjoyable to look up the correspondences.
I’ve been looking around to see if I could find the GHFC in digital format, but to no avail – darn! I really want to get that. Aristede used to do readings with it once in awhile at the AEtarot forum, and they were quite good ๐
If you find that comment by Sepharial, let me know!
Spiritsong